Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap WATCH to start the live stream.

Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap LISTEN to start the live stream.

Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap LATEST NEWS to start the live stream.

LISTEN
Watch
on air now

Create a 2GB account today!

You can now log in once to listen live, watch live, join competitions, enjoy exclusive 2GB content and other benefits.


Joining is free and easy.

You will soon need to register to keep streaming 2GB online. Register an account or skip for now to do it later.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Australian barrister says current drug driving laws are ‘not fair’

Article image for Australian barrister says current drug driving laws are ‘not fair’

Greg Barns, barrister and spokesman for the Australian Lawyers Alliance, says Australia’s drug driving laws aren’t evidence-based.

Mr Barns tells Mark Levy it’s not about what you have in your system but whether it impairs your driving.

“Drug driving laws simply criminalise anyone who has got a trace of a drug in their system, irrespective of whether or not that trace would cause impairment.

“We have evidence-based laws for drunk driving, we don’t have evidence-based laws for drug driving.”

Mark revealed methadone users can experience side effects of anxiety, nervousness and sleep problems while those who abuse the drug can experience seizures and hallucinations.

Mr Barns agreed if drivers are “impaired” by methadone, they shouldn’t be driving.

“If it impairs your driving then you shouldn’t be able to drive. It’s not about having something in your system, it’s about whether it impairs your driving.

“If a person was impaired as a result of using methadone they shouldn’t be on the road.”

Click PLAY below for the full interview

Mark Levy
Advertisement