2009-11-14 18:23:43

Now we start to see the reason why our "dear Leader" and his acolyte are so intransigent on the scientific evidence which has emerged since 2000 and is still emerging. The long term political objective, if he is unlikely to be the head honcho at the UN, is a seat at the World Government table.

Sandgroper

2009-11-14 13:16:48

Thanks Adrian for the actual document. This was the missing piece and while I have trusted the peopl ewho spoke out the treaty and th ereasons for it, this is what are REAL facts, not anyone's opinion. This is what should be presented to and debated by together again with the real facts - pro and con - regarding to climate change in a unpoliticised manner. The issue seems far to big that withotu a referendum signing the treatyy shoudl be done. It will effect future generations not only us.

Tibor Bode

2009-11-14 11:10:50

Found the two interviews with Lord Monkton and the American professor from MIT very interesting and enlightening. Where can I find the professor's name and a transcription or recording of his interview. I am unfamiliar with your web site but after a short search cannot find the profs interview or his name. rgds

James Broughton

2009-11-14 09:55:13

Hi Alan, Have you approached ACA, Today Tonight, and The 7.30 Report, about confronting the PM about this matter on national TV? That will be a more effective way of bringing it to the attention of more Australians. cheers Bob

Bob Helyar

2009-11-13 23:14:30

I'll do anything to support anti-AGW. I dislike the left but I do not want this to become a conservative agenda. We need more libertarian voices heard. Please don't censor this....that's what real climate do.

Sam Geoghegan